<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Return On Now &#187; data integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://returnonnow.com/tag/data-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://returnonnow.com</link>
	<description>White Hat / Ethical SEO, Social Media, Online Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Levels of Social – and Integration – Cut Across Enterprises</title>
		<link>http://returnonnow.com/2010/04/levels-social-integration-cut-enterprises/</link>
		<comments>http://returnonnow.com/2010/04/levels-social-integration-cut-enterprises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tpltx70</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real-Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bpm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connie moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julie hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://returnonnow.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, enjoy another compelling guest post by Julie Hunt of the Highly Competitive blog.

_____________

When I started writing articles for my blog Highly Competitive, I had in the back of my mind the “classic” advice for professional blogging: pick one main area to cover and as such, show my SME-ness for that area. So I should have selected a particular software solution space and stuck to it. <a href="http://returnonnow.com/2010/04/levels-social-integration-cut-enterprises/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, enjoy another compelling guest post by fellow Austin-ite and colleague Julie Hunt of the <a title="Highly Competitive Blog" href="http://jhcblog.juliehuntconsulting.com/" target="_blank">Highly Competitive blog</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">_____________</p>
<p>When  I started writing articles for my blog <a href="http://jhcblog.juliehuntconsulting.com/" target="_blank">Highly Competitive</a>, I had in the back of my mind the “classic” advice for  professional blogging: pick one main area to cover and as such, show my  SME-ness for that area. So I should have  selected a particular software solution space and stuck to it.</p>
<p>Well  that doesn’t really work for me and isn’t even realistic for anyone  analyzing today’s software infrastructures in most companies. As such, I  find myself covering multiple software topics, largely due to my  diverse software tech background, and it all makes sense as we see more  and more overt overlap and interconnection between the different  applications of any-size enterprises, and between the activities and  processes of how enterprises do business. As enterprises become more  customer-focused (outside-in), what has become especially interesting is  the evolution of change that eventually will produce Social businesses.</p>
<p>Starting with systems  infrastructure, many enterprises have multiple points of integration and  interoperability. It is this interrelatedness of systems that increases  the business value to the enterprise. Integrations and interconnections  are happening at multiple levels in businesses: their IT/application  infrastructures, the applications themselves, how teams function in the  enterprise interacting with systems and people, and how companies are  evolving for doing business and engaging buyers. To become an effective  Social Business, enterprises will have to nurture integrated internal  systems and processes, as well as social strategies and practices for  external and internal collaboration and communication.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="social media business data integration enterprise" src="http://juliehuntconsulting.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83536f99669e20133ec5ef2a0970b-800wi" alt="social media business data integration enterprise" width="576" height="387" /></p>
<h4><strong>Enterprises Can’t be Built on Silos – First, a Look at  Internal Interoperability </strong></h4>
<p>It  has become more and more clear that enterprises work better with  overtly interconnected systems and business processes. Silos within  enterprises both for systems and internal processes have caused a lot of  problems. Enterprises, no matter the size, cannot have teams, or  systems, operating in vacuums. Where too many silos persist, businesses  are doomed, whether the silos are technology or human based.</p>
<p>Understanding  how to reduce duplication in systems infrastructure, business  processes, team activities, and strategy implementation does much to  improve the health of the enterprise. Enterprises want to achieve  efficiencies of operation and want to do more with fewer resources, so  the elimination of duplications in systems and teams, and the increase  of integration (systems) and collaboration (people) is essential.</p>
<p>Since  we’re talking about the integrated enterprise, I see enterprise data  integration as an illustrative “metaphor”. In most cases data  integration endeavors to cut through almost everything in systems  infrastructure and involves multiple teams, both IT and Business.  Building really good DI processes requires the involvement and  collaboration of many teams. Data  integration solutions cannot be built in a vacuum to be effective; DI  initiatives embody a metaphoric sense of interrelationships and  interoperability: process, collaboration, disparate data feeds  (information sources) coming together, business rules, business needs.  People, business process and technology have worked together to achieve  the right results.</p>
<h4><strong>Social Capabilities and Strategies Appearing in Many  Enterprise Software Solutions</strong></h4>
<p>Increasingly,  enterprises are introducing and integrating social media for internal  and external applications.  And now many  “traditional” enterprise solutions are adding / integrating social  capabilities, to enhance the usability and relevance of these solutions.</p>
<p>Business  cases for social media include: internal implementations for enhanced  collaboration and communication purposes for employees; external  initiatives for better engagement and support of customers/buyers. Many  social media guidelines rightly advise that introducing social practices  and technology into an enterprise should come after a thorough  understanding of what is to be accomplished, and then after an  articulation of the strategy. Additionally, businesses have to figure  out what <a title="Social collaboration: Collaborating people, not tools | Return On Now" href="http://returnonnow.com/2010/02/01/social-collaboration-collaborating-people-tools/" target="_blank">cultural changes need to take  place internally</a>, for social to  make a big difference. Business social process is something that people  have to do authentically. Technology and tools do matter as a means of  enacting and managing social business processes, but they are no  substitute for strategic planning, best practices, real goals, and  serious consideration for the human participants.</p>
<p>Beyond  the social media technology that is being adopted by enterprises, many  “traditional” enterprise applications are becoming more “social”. This  is reasonable considering that software solutions are for use by people,  whether employees, customers/buyers, or partners. Most software  solutions are components of people-oriented processes. These  “socializing” solutions include: BPM, BI, CRM, ERP, internal  collaboration / intranet, and content management.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Recently Forrester’s Connie Moore &#8211; @<a title="cmooreforrester" href="http://twitter.com/cmooreforrester" target="_blank">cmooreforrester</a> &#8211; commented on  Twitter: “social computing has become the tipping  point for businesses and vendors finally marrying collaboration and  process” and then “Collaboration  between business and business and business and IT is core to any  successful <a title="#bpm" href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23bpm" target="_blank">#bpm</a> effort.” Connie Moore has extended her coverage of BPM to include social capabilities that will transform BPM solutions.</p>
<p>For  many software industry analysts and writers, there are no longer clear  demarcations between software solution spaces.  The  “classic” approach of separate software solution categories being  covered by SME writers is giving way to analysis that acknowledges the  interdependencies of different kinds of software solutions. We are seeing more collaborative work across  solutions, with social computing as a common thread of discussion. Analyst firms like Altimeter Group and Forrester are  working with more collaborative efforts from their staff analysts across  formerly separate software solution spaces to reflect the realities of  how enterprises operate.</p>
<h4><strong>And People Complete the Integrated Social Business</strong></h4>
<p>My  tech background has a markedly strong emphasis on people since software  companies are very people-intensive enterprises.  Many  teams need to collaborate to accomplish company goals and customer  needs, with the result that most teams are customer-oriented. If you  have a career in software technology, it is essential to recognize the  value of people, especially customers. Not surprisingly, many customers  of software technology are driving the change to Social Business where the focus is more on people and less on tech.</p>
<p>It’s  not just about why people buy or make technology decisions but about <strong>respecting </strong>people who are trying to accomplish  business tasks and solve real problems, and who just want their software  to work as advertised without a lot of pain to get there. Software  technology ultimately is a product to be sold, so the focus must be on  the purpose and real value the technology provides customers.</p>
<p>On  the software vendor side, people collaboration should be a top  priority: collaborations to sell solutions, collaborations to contribute  to customer/buyer success, collaboration with partners and customers  for success. Businesses can be very successful if they encourage and  engender internal cross-team collaborations focused on customer needs.  The <a href="http://jhcblog.juliehuntconsulting.com/2010/02/b2b-social-crm-for-software-vendors-and-the-lifecycle-of-customer-experience.html" target="_blank">growing interest in Social CRM</a> addresses how businesses develop customer relationships  to contribute to customer success.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Social  is partly about tapping into the connectedness that people are building  with the web as a platform.  Social Business  adoption by software vendors must be based on the fact that people and  relationships are what really drive success and longevity. The lesson to  enterprise management: Social media adoption has been driven by the  people who want to use it to communicate and work efficiently, no matter  the purpose.  Social media invaded enterprises  because people really want to use it – because it is effective for what  they are tasked to accomplish.</p>
<h4><strong>“Social Business” practices have been around for years </strong></h4>
<p>The  essentials of Social Business have been around for years in many  software enterprises – frequently as a “shadow” culture. A lot of  employees in the software industry have intuitively understood and  practiced aspects of the “social business”, recognizing the importance  of the customer and of collaboration.  The process  of selling software solutions to enterprises involves a lot of people  working with many other people, for internal and external purposes, no  matter the sales model.</p>
<p>Ironically employees, customers, partners have been  open to adopting social capabilities as part of doing business; the  executive level, however, is the laggard for authentic adoption of  social collaboration culture and processes. Upper management often has  impeded real efforts for social business and has also contributed to  creating silos within the company and chasms between teams. Many  software companies have been poorly structured for many years to be able  to nurture “social business”. Usually not enough people and not enough  budget have been allocated for fully supporting strong customer-centric  processes and initiatives.</p>
<p>It’s  very important that executive and other management levels formalize  strategies for Social Business and better empower the many employees who  already intuitively know how to find and keep customers/buyers through  social relationships and support for customer success.</p>
<p>Fully  empowered collaboration with customers and partners will improve sales,  product offerings, long-lasting relationships, and will lead to fewer  problems. Enterprise teams will be better connected to customers, and to  one another. And upper management may finally get real perspective on  employee motivations as well as customer desires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://returnonnow.com/2010/04/levels-social-integration-cut-enterprises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

